A lifetime of professional judgment — an appraiser's eye for provenance, an underwriter's instinct for risk, a master technician's process — captured as a product clients can use, with the expert reviewing what matters. It starts with a structured interview, not a spec document.
The demo shows a capture-mode interview with a senior fine-art appraiser — how decades of practice become reviewable product knowledge the expert signs off on.
Condition and provenance come first. But I never price a piece from a photograph alone — beginners always get that wrong.
Recorded as a decision rule: condition and provenance before comparables, and no valuation from photographs alone. What do you look at next when the provenance has a gap?
A gap in the 1930s reads differently than a gap last year. The period decides how much weight the rest of the file carries.
Stored as a paired rule with both contexts and your wording. I'll add it to the review sheet for your sign-off before it reaches any client.
Each rule is stored in the expert's own wording, linked to worked examples, and held for expert sign-off.
Client answers reuse the expert's terminology and caveats, not generic AI phrasing.
High-stakes requests wait for the human expert's review before anything is delivered.
Rollout playbook
Run capture sessions: the agent interviews the expert and organizes the method for their sign-off.
Upload the curated dataset and worked examples; mark which are client-visible and which are reference only.
Open a capped trial page for a first circle of clients, review transcripts with the expert, then widen access.
Next step
We will map the first bounded workflow, its approval points, and the evidence needed before broader rollout.